“Charles S. Peirce’s Theory of Signs”
Was anybody at all interested in this article about Peirce’s theory of signs? Seriously, I enjoy reading about certain articles about photography and if it’s something that is beneficial for me. Does anybody care about Peirce describing logic and breaking it into three areas of study along with science and philosophy? Maybe I’m being too critical and harsh, but did I miss something? This article was extremely boring and things were repeated over and over again. I understand that all modes of thinking depends on signs. I like to think that every thought is a sign. That to me is a very interesting statement. What are thoughts signs of though? Is this what Peirce explains in the rest of the article that I don’t understand? Can someone explain it to me in a simpler way!? I just don’t understand why Peirce goes into logic, science, and philosophy in such depth about “signs.” I really just think that I don’t understand the article and would really like to discuss it in class and hear what everyone has to say about it. Hopefully most people have read this article so someone can explain it to me because it seems interesting but just in too much depth for me to comprehend!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment